Mariusz Maciej Broniek vs Rudolf Lorenz
EU/WS/M/051, 2013 · Result ½–½ · Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted (C67).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mariusz Maciej Broniek vs Rudolf Lorenz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mariusz Maciej Broniek (2156)
- Black
- Rudolf Lorenz (2214)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- EU/WS/M/051
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted (C67)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mariusz Maciej Broniek (2156) and Rudolf Lorenz (2214) was played at EU/WS/M/051 in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted (C67). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mariusz Maciej Broniek games or Rudolf Lorenz games? This Mariusz Maciej Broniek vs Rudolf Lorenz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mariusz Maciej Broniek vs Rudolf Lorenz?
Mariusz Maciej Broniek vs Rudolf Lorenz (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Mariusz Maciej Broniek vs Rudolf Lorenz?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted (ECO C67).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mariusz Maciej Broniek vs Rudolf Lorenz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.