Alexis Bromo vs Rodolfo d Ettorre
FICGS__CHESS__THEMATIC_TOURNAMENT__000089, 2009 · Result 0–1 · King's Knight Opening: Normal Variation (C44).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alexis Bromo vs Rodolfo d Ettorre with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alexis Bromo (1447)
- Black
- Rodolfo d Ettorre (1950)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- FICGS__CHESS__THEMATIC_TOURNAMENT__000089
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- King's Knight Opening: Normal Variation (C44)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alexis Bromo (1447) and Rodolfo d Ettorre (1950) was played at FICGS__CHESS__THEMATIC_TOURNAMENT__000089 in 2009 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Knight Opening: Normal Variation (C44). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alexis Bromo games or Rodolfo d Ettorre games? This Alexis Bromo vs Rodolfo d Ettorre encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Knight Opening: Normal Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alexis Bromo vs Rodolfo d Ettorre?
Alexis Bromo vs Rodolfo d Ettorre (2009) finished 0–1, a win for Rodolfo d Ettorre.
What opening was played in Alexis Bromo vs Rodolfo d Ettorre?
The game opened with the King's Knight Opening: Normal Variation (ECO C44).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alexis Bromo vs Rodolfo d Ettorre, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.