Dirk Brinkman vs Christoph Tiemann
500-Staedteturnier, date unknown · Result ½–½ · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E35).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Dirk Brinkman vs Christoph Tiemann with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Dirk Brinkman (1779)
- Black
- Christoph Tiemann (1902)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 500-Staedteturnier
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E35)
About this chess game
This chess game between Dirk Brinkman (1779) and Christoph Tiemann (1902) was played at 500-Staedteturnier and finished ½–½. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E35). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Dirk Brinkman games or Christoph Tiemann games? This Dirk Brinkman vs Christoph Tiemann encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Dirk Brinkman vs Christoph Tiemann?
Dirk Brinkman vs Christoph Tiemann finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Dirk Brinkman vs Christoph Tiemann?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (ECO E35).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Dirk Brinkman vs Christoph Tiemann, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.