Vladislav Brankovic vs Radivoje Vulinovic
2015 · Result ½–½ · Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish (C49).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Vladislav Brankovic vs Radivoje Vulinovic with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Vladislav Brankovic (2215)
- Black
- Radivoje Vulinovic (2200)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish (C49)
About this chess game
This chess game between Vladislav Brankovic (2215) and Radivoje Vulinovic (2200) was played in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish (C49). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Vladislav Brankovic games or Radivoje Vulinovic games? This Vladislav Brankovic vs Radivoje Vulinovic encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Vladislav Brankovic vs Radivoje Vulinovic?
Vladislav Brankovic vs Radivoje Vulinovic (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Vladislav Brankovic vs Radivoje Vulinovic?
The game opened with the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish (ECO C49).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Vladislav Brankovic vs Radivoje Vulinovic, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.