Juergen Brandt vs Eva-Maria Wilfert
2016 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation (A22).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Juergen Brandt vs Eva-Maria Wilfert with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Juergen Brandt (1818)
- Black
- Eva-Maria Wilfert (1653)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation (A22)
About this chess game
This chess game between Juergen Brandt (1818) and Eva-Maria Wilfert (1653) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation (A22). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Juergen Brandt games or Eva-Maria Wilfert games? This Juergen Brandt vs Eva-Maria Wilfert encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Juergen Brandt vs Eva-Maria Wilfert?
Juergen Brandt vs Eva-Maria Wilfert (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Juergen Brandt vs Eva-Maria Wilfert?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation (ECO A22).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Juergen Brandt vs Eva-Maria Wilfert, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.