Tarik Boutahar Belgasi vs David 2012 Martinez Lopez
78. ch-ESP 2013, 2013 · Result 0–1 · Zukertort Opening (A05).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Tarik Boutahar Belgasi vs David 2012 Martinez Lopez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Tarik Boutahar Belgasi (1980)
- Black
- David 2012 Martinez Lopez (2238)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 78. ch-ESP 2013
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Zukertort Opening (A05)
About this chess game
This chess game between Tarik Boutahar Belgasi (1980) and David 2012 Martinez Lopez (2238) was played at 78. ch-ESP 2013 in 2013 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Zukertort Opening (A05). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Tarik Boutahar Belgasi games or David 2012 Martinez Lopez games? This Tarik Boutahar Belgasi vs David 2012 Martinez Lopez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Zukertort Opening.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Tarik Boutahar Belgasi vs David 2012 Martinez Lopez?
Tarik Boutahar Belgasi vs David 2012 Martinez Lopez (2013) finished 0–1, a win for David 2012 Martinez Lopez.
What opening was played in Tarik Boutahar Belgasi vs David 2012 Martinez Lopez?
The game opened with the Zukertort Opening (ECO A05).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Tarik Boutahar Belgasi vs David 2012 Martinez Lopez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.