Andre Bourassa vs Daniel Dube
Montcalm Open 1 2013-14, 2013 · Result 0–1 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation (E38).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Andre Bourassa vs Daniel Dube with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Andre Bourassa (1696)
- Black
- Daniel Dube (1646)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Montcalm Open 1 2013-14
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation (E38)
About this chess game
This chess game between Andre Bourassa (1696) and Daniel Dube (1646) was played at Montcalm Open 1 2013-14 in 2013 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation (E38). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Andre Bourassa games or Daniel Dube games? This Andre Bourassa vs Daniel Dube encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Andre Bourassa vs Daniel Dube?
Andre Bourassa vs Daniel Dube (2013) finished 0–1, a win for Daniel Dube.
What opening was played in Andre Bourassa vs Daniel Dube?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation (ECO E38).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Andre Bourassa vs Daniel Dube, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.