Carlos Augusto Botta vs Daniel Jabot
EM/M/A086, 1999 · Result 0–1 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E37).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Carlos Augusto Botta vs Daniel Jabot with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Carlos Augusto Botta
- Black
- Daniel Jabot (2153)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- EM/M/A086
- Year
- 1999
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E37)
About this chess game
This chess game between Carlos Augusto Botta and Daniel Jabot (2153) was played at EM/M/A086 in 1999 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E37). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Carlos Augusto Botta games or Daniel Jabot games? This Carlos Augusto Botta vs Daniel Jabot encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Carlos Augusto Botta vs Daniel Jabot?
Carlos Augusto Botta vs Daniel Jabot (1999) finished 0–1, a win for Daniel Jabot.
What opening was played in Carlos Augusto Botta vs Daniel Jabot?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (ECO E37).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Carlos Augusto Botta vs Daniel Jabot, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.