Alexandra Botez vs Alice Huanyi Xiao
British Columbia Ch women, 2011 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation (D35).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alexandra Botez vs Alice Huanyi Xiao with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alexandra Botez (1997)
- Black
- Alice Huanyi Xiao (1877)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- British Columbia Ch women
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation (D35)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alexandra Botez (1997) and Alice Huanyi Xiao (1877) was played at British Columbia Ch women in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation (D35). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alexandra Botez games or Alice Huanyi Xiao games? This Alexandra Botez vs Alice Huanyi Xiao encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alexandra Botez vs Alice Huanyi Xiao?
Alexandra Botez vs Alice Huanyi Xiao (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Alexandra Botez.
What opening was played in Alexandra Botez vs Alice Huanyi Xiao?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation (ECO D35).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alexandra Botez vs Alice Huanyi Xiao, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.