Valentin Bote Alvarez-Carrasco vs David Rivas Vila
2012 · Result ½–½ · Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation (A87).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Valentin Bote Alvarez-Carrasco vs David Rivas Vila with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Valentin Bote Alvarez-Carrasco (2137)
- Black
- David Rivas Vila (2213)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation (A87)
About this chess game
This chess game between Valentin Bote Alvarez-Carrasco (2137) and David Rivas Vila (2213) was played in 2012 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation (A87). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Valentin Bote Alvarez-Carrasco games or David Rivas Vila games? This Valentin Bote Alvarez-Carrasco vs David Rivas Vila encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Valentin Bote Alvarez-Carrasco vs David Rivas Vila?
Valentin Bote Alvarez-Carrasco vs David Rivas Vila (2012) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Valentin Bote Alvarez-Carrasco vs David Rivas Vila?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation (ECO A87).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Valentin Bote Alvarez-Carrasco vs David Rivas Vila, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.