Roberto Bosetti vs Luca Saviozzi
ITA/CIM29 (ITA), 2012 · Result 1–0 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense (E59).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Roberto Bosetti vs Luca Saviozzi with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Roberto Bosetti (1874)
- Black
- Luca Saviozzi (1846)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- ITA/CIM29 (ITA)
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense (E59)
About this chess game
This chess game between Roberto Bosetti (1874) and Luca Saviozzi (1846) was played at ITA/CIM29 (ITA) in 2012 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense (E59). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Roberto Bosetti games or Luca Saviozzi games? This Roberto Bosetti vs Luca Saviozzi encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Roberto Bosetti vs Luca Saviozzi?
Roberto Bosetti vs Luca Saviozzi (2012) finished 1–0, a win for Roberto Bosetti.
What opening was played in Roberto Bosetti vs Luca Saviozzi?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense (ECO E59).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Roberto Bosetti vs Luca Saviozzi, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.