Moacir Canella Bortoloso vs Fabio Alcantara Martins Silva
2017 · Result ½–½ · Scandinavian Defense (B01).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Moacir Canella Bortoloso vs Fabio Alcantara Martins Silva with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Moacir Canella Bortoloso (2079)
- Black
- Fabio Alcantara Martins Silva (1800)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Scandinavian Defense (B01)
About this chess game
This chess game between Moacir Canella Bortoloso (2079) and Fabio Alcantara Martins Silva (1800) was played in 2017 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Scandinavian Defense (B01). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Moacir Canella Bortoloso games or Fabio Alcantara Martins Silva games? This Moacir Canella Bortoloso vs Fabio Alcantara Martins Silva encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Scandinavian Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Moacir Canella Bortoloso vs Fabio Alcantara Martins Silva?
Moacir Canella Bortoloso vs Fabio Alcantara Martins Silva (2017) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Moacir Canella Bortoloso vs Fabio Alcantara Martins Silva?
The game opened with the Scandinavian Defense (ECO B01).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Moacir Canella Bortoloso vs Fabio Alcantara Martins Silva, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.