Adam Borkowski vs Michal Hryszkiewicz
2009 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian (A21).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Adam Borkowski vs Michal Hryszkiewicz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Adam Borkowski (1775)
- Black
- Michal Hryszkiewicz (1784)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian (A21)
About this chess game
This chess game between Adam Borkowski (1775) and Michal Hryszkiewicz (1784) was played in 2009 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian (A21). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Adam Borkowski games or Michal Hryszkiewicz games? This Adam Borkowski vs Michal Hryszkiewicz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Adam Borkowski vs Michal Hryszkiewicz?
Adam Borkowski vs Michal Hryszkiewicz (2009) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Adam Borkowski vs Michal Hryszkiewicz?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian (ECO A21).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Adam Borkowski vs Michal Hryszkiewicz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.