Fabio Bonoldi vs Albert Nikolaevich Efimov
CT21/pr28, 2015 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: King's English Variation (A20).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Fabio Bonoldi vs Albert Nikolaevich Efimov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Fabio Bonoldi (1831)
- Black
- Albert Nikolaevich Efimov (1911)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- CT21/pr28
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation (A20)
About this chess game
This chess game between Fabio Bonoldi (1831) and Albert Nikolaevich Efimov (1911) was played at CT21/pr28 in 2015 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation (A20). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Fabio Bonoldi games or Albert Nikolaevich Efimov games? This Fabio Bonoldi vs Albert Nikolaevich Efimov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Fabio Bonoldi vs Albert Nikolaevich Efimov?
Fabio Bonoldi vs Albert Nikolaevich Efimov (2015) finished 1–0, a win for Fabio Bonoldi.
What opening was played in Fabio Bonoldi vs Albert Nikolaevich Efimov?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation (ECO A20).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Fabio Bonoldi vs Albert Nikolaevich Efimov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.