Reinhard Bonnmann vs Antoon Van Lanen
2018 · Result 1–0 · Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Reinhard Bonnmann vs Antoon Van Lanen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Reinhard Bonnmann (2247)
- Black
- Antoon Van Lanen (2191)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34)
About this chess game
This chess game between Reinhard Bonnmann (2247) and Antoon Van Lanen (2191) was played in 2018 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Reinhard Bonnmann games or Antoon Van Lanen games? This Reinhard Bonnmann vs Antoon Van Lanen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Reinhard Bonnmann vs Antoon Van Lanen?
Reinhard Bonnmann vs Antoon Van Lanen (2018) finished 1–0, a win for Reinhard Bonnmann.
What opening was played in Reinhard Bonnmann vs Antoon Van Lanen?
The game opened with the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (ECO D34).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Reinhard Bonnmann vs Antoon Van Lanen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.