Felix Antonio Bonilla Torrero vs Rodrigo Gutierrez
date unknown · Result 0–1 · English Opening: Mikenas-Carls Variation (A18).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Felix Antonio Bonilla Torrero vs Rodrigo Gutierrez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Felix Antonio Bonilla Torrero (2188)
- Black
- Rodrigo Gutierrez
- Result
- 0–1
- Opening
- English Opening: Mikenas-Carls Variation (A18)
About this chess game
This chess game between Felix Antonio Bonilla Torrero (2188) and Rodrigo Gutierrez was played and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: Mikenas-Carls Variation (A18). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Felix Antonio Bonilla Torrero games or Rodrigo Gutierrez games? This Felix Antonio Bonilla Torrero vs Rodrigo Gutierrez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Mikenas-Carls Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Felix Antonio Bonilla Torrero vs Rodrigo Gutierrez?
Felix Antonio Bonilla Torrero vs Rodrigo Gutierrez finished 0–1, a win for Rodrigo Gutierrez.
What opening was played in Felix Antonio Bonilla Torrero vs Rodrigo Gutierrez?
The game opened with the English Opening: Mikenas-Carls Variation (ECO A18).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Felix Antonio Bonilla Torrero vs Rodrigo Gutierrez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.