Hudson Soares do Bonfim vs Marcelo Leite Lopes
2014 · Result ½–½ · Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit (A07).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Hudson Soares do Bonfim vs Marcelo Leite Lopes with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Hudson Soares do Bonfim (1937)
- Black
- Marcelo Leite Lopes (1830)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit (A07)
About this chess game
This chess game between Hudson Soares do Bonfim (1937) and Marcelo Leite Lopes (1830) was played in 2014 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit (A07). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Hudson Soares do Bonfim games or Marcelo Leite Lopes games? This Hudson Soares do Bonfim vs Marcelo Leite Lopes encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Hudson Soares do Bonfim vs Marcelo Leite Lopes?
Hudson Soares do Bonfim vs Marcelo Leite Lopes (2014) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Hudson Soares do Bonfim vs Marcelo Leite Lopes?
The game opened with the Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit (ECO A07).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Hudson Soares do Bonfim vs Marcelo Leite Lopes, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.