Ivan 2010 Bondarev vs Evgeny Kopasov
Chigorin Memorial Open, 2011 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line (B52).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ivan 2010 Bondarev vs Evgeny Kopasov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ivan 2010 Bondarev (1892)
- Black
- Evgeny Kopasov (2059)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Chigorin Memorial Open
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line (B52)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ivan 2010 Bondarev (1892) and Evgeny Kopasov (2059) was played at Chigorin Memorial Open in 2011 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line (B52). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ivan 2010 Bondarev games or Evgeny Kopasov games? This Ivan 2010 Bondarev vs Evgeny Kopasov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ivan 2010 Bondarev vs Evgeny Kopasov?
Ivan 2010 Bondarev vs Evgeny Kopasov (2011) finished 0–1, a win for Evgeny Kopasov.
What opening was played in Ivan 2010 Bondarev vs Evgeny Kopasov?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line (ECO B52).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ivan 2010 Bondarev vs Evgeny Kopasov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.