Peter Bombek vs Javier Cardena Contreras
19. Olomouc Open 2016, 2016 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D05).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Peter Bombek vs Javier Cardena Contreras with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Peter Bombek (2212)
- Black
- Javier Cardena Contreras (1983)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 19. Olomouc Open 2016
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D05)
About this chess game
This chess game between Peter Bombek (2212) and Javier Cardena Contreras (1983) was played at 19. Olomouc Open 2016 in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D05). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Peter Bombek games or Javier Cardena Contreras games? This Peter Bombek vs Javier Cardena Contreras encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Peter Bombek vs Javier Cardena Contreras?
Peter Bombek vs Javier Cardena Contreras (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Peter Bombek.
What opening was played in Peter Bombek vs Javier Cardena Contreras?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (ECO D05).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Peter Bombek vs Javier Cardena Contreras, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.