Boban Bogosavljevic vs Milovan Ratkovic
2017 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Boban Bogosavljevic vs Milovan Ratkovic with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Boban Bogosavljevic (2532)
- Black
- Milovan Ratkovic (2398)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81)
About this chess game
This chess game between Boban Bogosavljevic (2532) and Milovan Ratkovic (2398) was played in 2017 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Boban Bogosavljevic games or Milovan Ratkovic games? This Boban Bogosavljevic vs Milovan Ratkovic encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Boban Bogosavljevic vs Milovan Ratkovic?
Boban Bogosavljevic vs Milovan Ratkovic (2017) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Boban Bogosavljevic vs Milovan Ratkovic?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (ECO E81).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Boban Bogosavljevic vs Milovan Ratkovic, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.