Paul Bogenschuetze vs Bernhard, Dr. Feith
2009 · Result ½–½ · French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C18).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Paul Bogenschuetze vs Bernhard, Dr. Feith with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Paul Bogenschuetze (2095)
- Black
- Bernhard, Dr. Feith (1846)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C18)
About this chess game
This chess game between Paul Bogenschuetze (2095) and Bernhard, Dr. Feith (1846) was played in 2009 and finished ½–½. The opening was the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C18). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Paul Bogenschuetze games or Bernhard, Dr. Feith games? This Paul Bogenschuetze vs Bernhard, Dr. Feith encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Paul Bogenschuetze vs Bernhard, Dr. Feith?
Paul Bogenschuetze vs Bernhard, Dr. Feith (2009) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Paul Bogenschuetze vs Bernhard, Dr. Feith?
The game opened with the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (ECO C18).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Paul Bogenschuetze vs Bernhard, Dr. Feith, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.