Sebastian Boehme vs Patrice Danzanvilliers
6. LSS WCH Q-00016, 2016 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (B90).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Sebastian Boehme vs Patrice Danzanvilliers with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Sebastian Boehme (1650)
- Black
- Patrice Danzanvilliers (1717)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 6. LSS WCH Q-00016
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (B90)
About this chess game
This chess game between Sebastian Boehme (1650) and Patrice Danzanvilliers (1717) was played at 6. LSS WCH Q-00016 in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (B90). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Sebastian Boehme games or Patrice Danzanvilliers games? This Sebastian Boehme vs Patrice Danzanvilliers encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Sebastian Boehme vs Patrice Danzanvilliers?
Sebastian Boehme vs Patrice Danzanvilliers (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Sebastian Boehme.
What opening was played in Sebastian Boehme vs Patrice Danzanvilliers?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (ECO B90).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Sebastian Boehme vs Patrice Danzanvilliers, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.