Moacir Luis Boeck vs Gabriela Luisa Vicente Feller
2016 · Result 1–0 · French Defense: Advance Variation (C02).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Moacir Luis Boeck vs Gabriela Luisa Vicente Feller with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Moacir Luis Boeck (1841)
- Black
- Gabriela Luisa Vicente Feller (1493)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- French Defense: Advance Variation (C02)
About this chess game
This chess game between Moacir Luis Boeck (1841) and Gabriela Luisa Vicente Feller (1493) was played in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the French Defense: Advance Variation (C02). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Moacir Luis Boeck games or Gabriela Luisa Vicente Feller games? This Moacir Luis Boeck vs Gabriela Luisa Vicente Feller encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Advance Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Moacir Luis Boeck vs Gabriela Luisa Vicente Feller?
Moacir Luis Boeck vs Gabriela Luisa Vicente Feller (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Moacir Luis Boeck.
What opening was played in Moacir Luis Boeck vs Gabriela Luisa Vicente Feller?
The game opened with the French Defense: Advance Variation (ECO C02).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Moacir Luis Boeck vs Gabriela Luisa Vicente Feller, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.