Laszlo Bodrogi vs Laszlo Gyorgy Ats
2018 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Capablanca Variation (D63).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Laszlo Bodrogi vs Laszlo Gyorgy Ats with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Laszlo Bodrogi (1851)
- Black
- Laszlo Gyorgy Ats (2002)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Capablanca Variation (D63)
About this chess game
This chess game between Laszlo Bodrogi (1851) and Laszlo Gyorgy Ats (2002) was played in 2018 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Capablanca Variation (D63). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Laszlo Bodrogi games or Laszlo Gyorgy Ats games? This Laszlo Bodrogi vs Laszlo Gyorgy Ats encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Capablanca Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Laszlo Bodrogi vs Laszlo Gyorgy Ats?
Laszlo Bodrogi vs Laszlo Gyorgy Ats (2018) finished 0–1, a win for Laszlo Gyorgy Ats.
What opening was played in Laszlo Bodrogi vs Laszlo Gyorgy Ats?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Capablanca Variation (ECO D63).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Laszlo Bodrogi vs Laszlo Gyorgy Ats, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.