Dmitry Bocharov vs Aleksander A. Obukhov
11. Master Open, 2007 · Result 1–0 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Dmitry Bocharov vs Aleksander A. Obukhov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Dmitry Bocharov (2614)
- Black
- Aleksander A. Obukhov (2446)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 11. Master Open
- Year
- 2007
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32)
About this chess game
This chess game between Dmitry Bocharov (2614) and Aleksander A. Obukhov (2446) was played at 11. Master Open in 2007 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Dmitry Bocharov games or Aleksander A. Obukhov games? This Dmitry Bocharov vs Aleksander A. Obukhov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Dmitry Bocharov vs Aleksander A. Obukhov?
Dmitry Bocharov vs Aleksander A. Obukhov (2007) finished 1–0, a win for Dmitry Bocharov.
What opening was played in Dmitry Bocharov vs Aleksander A. Obukhov?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (ECO E32).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Dmitry Bocharov vs Aleksander A. Obukhov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.