Edson Ricardo Bocca vs Aquiles Machado De Oliveira
2014 · Result 0–1 · Vienna Game: Falkbeer Variation (C26).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Edson Ricardo Bocca vs Aquiles Machado De Oliveira with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Edson Ricardo Bocca (1580)
- Black
- Aquiles Machado De Oliveira (2056)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Vienna Game: Falkbeer Variation (C26)
About this chess game
This chess game between Edson Ricardo Bocca (1580) and Aquiles Machado De Oliveira (2056) was played in 2014 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Vienna Game: Falkbeer Variation (C26). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Edson Ricardo Bocca games or Aquiles Machado De Oliveira games? This Edson Ricardo Bocca vs Aquiles Machado De Oliveira encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Vienna Game: Falkbeer Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Edson Ricardo Bocca vs Aquiles Machado De Oliveira?
Edson Ricardo Bocca vs Aquiles Machado De Oliveira (2014) finished 0–1, a win for Aquiles Machado De Oliveira.
What opening was played in Edson Ricardo Bocca vs Aquiles Machado De Oliveira?
The game opened with the Vienna Game: Falkbeer Variation (ECO C26).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Edson Ricardo Bocca vs Aquiles Machado De Oliveira, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.