Vadim Bobkov vs Nikita Artemov
22. Voronezh FIDE Open, 2018 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation, Benoni Defense (E74).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Vadim Bobkov vs Nikita Artemov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Vadim Bobkov (2058)
- Black
- Nikita Artemov (1970)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 22. Voronezh FIDE Open
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation, Benoni Defense (E74)
About this chess game
This chess game between Vadim Bobkov (2058) and Nikita Artemov (1970) was played at 22. Voronezh FIDE Open in 2018 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation, Benoni Defense (E74). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Vadim Bobkov games or Nikita Artemov games? This Vadim Bobkov vs Nikita Artemov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation, Benoni Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Vadim Bobkov vs Nikita Artemov?
Vadim Bobkov vs Nikita Artemov (2018) finished 0–1, a win for Nikita Artemov.
What opening was played in Vadim Bobkov vs Nikita Artemov?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation, Benoni Defense (ECO E74).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Vadim Bobkov vs Nikita Artemov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.