Jorge Boada Llombart vs Nico Daubenfeld
EIC 67SF 01, 2005 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Main Line (B99).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jorge Boada Llombart vs Nico Daubenfeld with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jorge Boada Llombart (2342)
- Black
- Nico Daubenfeld (1989)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- EIC 67SF 01
- Year
- 2005
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Main Line (B99)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jorge Boada Llombart (2342) and Nico Daubenfeld (1989) was played at EIC 67SF 01 in 2005 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Main Line (B99). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jorge Boada Llombart games or Nico Daubenfeld games? This Jorge Boada Llombart vs Nico Daubenfeld encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jorge Boada Llombart vs Nico Daubenfeld?
Jorge Boada Llombart vs Nico Daubenfeld (2005) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Jorge Boada Llombart vs Nico Daubenfeld?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Main Line (ECO B99).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jorge Boada Llombart vs Nico Daubenfeld, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.