Boris Mikhailovich Blitsko vs Etienne Van Leeuwen
EU/TC11/sf2, 2017 · Result ½–½ · Ruy Lopez: Marshall Attack (C89).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Boris Mikhailovich Blitsko vs Etienne Van Leeuwen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Boris Mikhailovich Blitsko (2497)
- Black
- Etienne Van Leeuwen (2021)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- EU/TC11/sf2
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Marshall Attack (C89)
About this chess game
This chess game between Boris Mikhailovich Blitsko (2497) and Etienne Van Leeuwen (2021) was played at EU/TC11/sf2 in 2017 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Marshall Attack (C89). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Boris Mikhailovich Blitsko games or Etienne Van Leeuwen games? This Boris Mikhailovich Blitsko vs Etienne Van Leeuwen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Marshall Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Boris Mikhailovich Blitsko vs Etienne Van Leeuwen?
Boris Mikhailovich Blitsko vs Etienne Van Leeuwen (2017) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Boris Mikhailovich Blitsko vs Etienne Van Leeuwen?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Marshall Attack (ECO C89).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Boris Mikhailovich Blitsko vs Etienne Van Leeuwen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.