Boris Mikhailovich Blitsko vs Sergey Stanislavovi Bancevich
BLR/C11 (BLR), 2011 · Result 1–0 · Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B19).
Analyze this game
Open Boris Mikhailovich Blitsko vs Sergey Stanislavovi Bancevich on the CipherChess board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Open the Analysis BoardMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Boris Mikhailovich Blitsko (2330)
- Black
- Sergey Stanislavovi Bancevich (2368)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- BLR/C11 (BLR)
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B19)
About this chess game
This chess game between Boris Mikhailovich Blitsko (2330) and Sergey Stanislavovi Bancevich (2368) was played at BLR/C11 (BLR) in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B19). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Boris Mikhailovich Blitsko games or Sergey Stanislavovi Bancevich games? This Boris Mikhailovich Blitsko vs Sergey Stanislavovi Bancevich encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Boris Mikhailovich Blitsko vs Sergey Stanislavovi Bancevich?
Boris Mikhailovich Blitsko vs Sergey Stanislavovi Bancevich (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Boris Mikhailovich Blitsko.
What opening was played in Boris Mikhailovich Blitsko vs Sergey Stanislavovi Bancevich?
The game opened with the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (ECO B19).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Boris Mikhailovich Blitsko vs Sergey Stanislavovi Bancevich, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.