Victorino Blazquez Lopez vs Ricardo Nelson Carranza Pons
3. Open, 2008 · Result 1–0 · Amar Opening (A00).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Victorino Blazquez Lopez vs Ricardo Nelson Carranza Pons with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Victorino Blazquez Lopez (1762)
- Black
- Ricardo Nelson Carranza Pons (1853)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 3. Open
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- Amar Opening (A00)
About this chess game
This chess game between Victorino Blazquez Lopez (1762) and Ricardo Nelson Carranza Pons (1853) was played at 3. Open in 2008 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Amar Opening (A00). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Victorino Blazquez Lopez games or Ricardo Nelson Carranza Pons games? This Victorino Blazquez Lopez vs Ricardo Nelson Carranza Pons encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Amar Opening.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Victorino Blazquez Lopez vs Ricardo Nelson Carranza Pons?
Victorino Blazquez Lopez vs Ricardo Nelson Carranza Pons (2008) finished 1–0, a win for Victorino Blazquez Lopez.
What opening was played in Victorino Blazquez Lopez vs Ricardo Nelson Carranza Pons?
The game opened with the Amar Opening (ECO A00).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Victorino Blazquez Lopez vs Ricardo Nelson Carranza Pons, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.