Luis Guillermo Blandon vs Jose Fernando Casas
2019 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation (B60).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Luis Guillermo Blandon vs Jose Fernando Casas with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Luis Guillermo Blandon (2258)
- Black
- Jose Fernando Casas (1733)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation (B60)
About this chess game
This chess game between Luis Guillermo Blandon (2258) and Jose Fernando Casas (1733) was played in 2019 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation (B60). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Luis Guillermo Blandon games or Jose Fernando Casas games? This Luis Guillermo Blandon vs Jose Fernando Casas encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Luis Guillermo Blandon vs Jose Fernando Casas?
Luis Guillermo Blandon vs Jose Fernando Casas (2019) finished 1–0, a win for Luis Guillermo Blandon.
What opening was played in Luis Guillermo Blandon vs Jose Fernando Casas?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation (ECO B60).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Luis Guillermo Blandon vs Jose Fernando Casas, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.