Juan Jesus Blanco vs Henry Contreras
2012 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Juan Jesus Blanco vs Henry Contreras with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Juan Jesus Blanco (1963)
- Black
- Henry Contreras (2191)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84)
About this chess game
This chess game between Juan Jesus Blanco (1963) and Henry Contreras (2191) was played in 2012 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Juan Jesus Blanco games or Henry Contreras games? This Juan Jesus Blanco vs Henry Contreras encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Juan Jesus Blanco vs Henry Contreras?
Juan Jesus Blanco vs Henry Contreras (2012) finished 1–0, a win for Juan Jesus Blanco.
What opening was played in Juan Jesus Blanco vs Henry Contreras?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (ECO B84).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Juan Jesus Blanco vs Henry Contreras, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.