Lidija Blagojevic vs Neda Bojovic
2015 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation (A36).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Lidija Blagojevic vs Neda Bojovic with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Lidija Blagojevic (1991)
- Black
- Neda Bojovic (1284)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation (A36)
About this chess game
This chess game between Lidija Blagojevic (1991) and Neda Bojovic (1284) was played in 2015 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation (A36). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Lidija Blagojevic games or Neda Bojovic games? This Lidija Blagojevic vs Neda Bojovic encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Lidija Blagojevic vs Neda Bojovic?
Lidija Blagojevic vs Neda Bojovic (2015) finished 1–0, a win for Lidija Blagojevic.
What opening was played in Lidija Blagojevic vs Neda Bojovic?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation (ECO A36).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Lidija Blagojevic vs Neda Bojovic, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.