Richard Bjerke vs Eirik Gullaksen
Open A, 2009 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Richard Bjerke vs Eirik Gullaksen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Richard Bjerke (2179)
- Black
- Eirik Gullaksen (2400)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Open A
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94)
About this chess game
This chess game between Richard Bjerke (2179) and Eirik Gullaksen (2400) was played at Open A in 2009 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Richard Bjerke games or Eirik Gullaksen games? This Richard Bjerke vs Eirik Gullaksen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Richard Bjerke vs Eirik Gullaksen?
Richard Bjerke vs Eirik Gullaksen (2009) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Richard Bjerke vs Eirik Gullaksen?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (ECO E94).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Richard Bjerke vs Eirik Gullaksen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.