Salko Bjelopoljak vs Jasmin Kadusic
2008 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation (A16).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Salko Bjelopoljak vs Jasmin Kadusic with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Salko Bjelopoljak (2090)
- Black
- Jasmin Kadusic (1974)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation (A16)
About this chess game
This chess game between Salko Bjelopoljak (2090) and Jasmin Kadusic (1974) was played in 2008 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation (A16). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Salko Bjelopoljak games or Jasmin Kadusic games? This Salko Bjelopoljak vs Jasmin Kadusic encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Salko Bjelopoljak vs Jasmin Kadusic?
Salko Bjelopoljak vs Jasmin Kadusic (2008) finished 1–0, a win for Salko Bjelopoljak.
What opening was played in Salko Bjelopoljak vs Jasmin Kadusic?
The game opened with the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation (ECO A16).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Salko Bjelopoljak vs Jasmin Kadusic, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.