Odd Birkestrand vs Ernst Zindel
Bad Woerishofen 2017 - Senioren, 2017 · Result 0–1 · Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense (C58).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Odd Birkestrand vs Ernst Zindel with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Odd Birkestrand (1726)
- Black
- Ernst Zindel (1898)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Bad Woerishofen 2017 - Senioren
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense (C58)
About this chess game
This chess game between Odd Birkestrand (1726) and Ernst Zindel (1898) was played at Bad Woerishofen 2017 - Senioren in 2017 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense (C58). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Odd Birkestrand games or Ernst Zindel games? This Odd Birkestrand vs Ernst Zindel encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Odd Birkestrand vs Ernst Zindel?
Odd Birkestrand vs Ernst Zindel (2017) finished 0–1, a win for Ernst Zindel.
What opening was played in Odd Birkestrand vs Ernst Zindel?
The game opened with the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense (ECO C58).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Odd Birkestrand vs Ernst Zindel, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.