Nick Bijlsma vs Thomas Beerdsen
Dutch League 2022-23, 2022 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Nick Bijlsma vs Thomas Beerdsen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Nick Bijlsma (2292)
- Black
- Thomas Beerdsen (2520)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Dutch League 2022-23
- Year
- 2022
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92)
About this chess game
This chess game between Nick Bijlsma (2292) and Thomas Beerdsen (2520) was played at Dutch League 2022-23 in 2022 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Nick Bijlsma games or Thomas Beerdsen games? This Nick Bijlsma vs Thomas Beerdsen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Nick Bijlsma vs Thomas Beerdsen?
Nick Bijlsma vs Thomas Beerdsen (2022) finished 0–1, a win for Thomas Beerdsen.
What opening was played in Nick Bijlsma vs Thomas Beerdsen?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (ECO B92).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Nick Bijlsma vs Thomas Beerdsen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.