Stanislaw Bieszk vs Ivan Petrov
OP-01703, 2011 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation (B67).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Stanislaw Bieszk vs Ivan Petrov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Stanislaw Bieszk (1709)
- Black
- Ivan Petrov (2178)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- OP-01703
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation (B67)
About this chess game
This chess game between Stanislaw Bieszk (1709) and Ivan Petrov (2178) was played at OP-01703 in 2011 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation (B67). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Stanislaw Bieszk games or Ivan Petrov games? This Stanislaw Bieszk vs Ivan Petrov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Stanislaw Bieszk vs Ivan Petrov?
Stanislaw Bieszk vs Ivan Petrov (2011) finished 0–1, a win for Ivan Petrov.
What opening was played in Stanislaw Bieszk vs Ivan Petrov?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation (ECO B67).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Stanislaw Bieszk vs Ivan Petrov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.