Jean Biblocque vs Pascal Le Fournier
Corr AJEC/1131, date unknown · Result 0–1 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation (A34).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jean Biblocque vs Pascal Le Fournier with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jean Biblocque
- Black
- Pascal Le Fournier (2190)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Corr AJEC/1131
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation (A34)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jean Biblocque and Pascal Le Fournier (2190) was played at Corr AJEC/1131 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation (A34). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jean Biblocque games or Pascal Le Fournier games? This Jean Biblocque vs Pascal Le Fournier encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jean Biblocque vs Pascal Le Fournier?
Jean Biblocque vs Pascal Le Fournier finished 0–1, a win for Pascal Le Fournier.
What opening was played in Jean Biblocque vs Pascal Le Fournier?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation (ECO A34).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jean Biblocque vs Pascal Le Fournier, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.