Roberto Bevilacqua vs Riccardo Larghi
C.to Provinciale CO, 1999 · Result 1–0 · Benoni Defense: Four Pawns Attack, Main Line (A69).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Roberto Bevilacqua vs Riccardo Larghi with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Roberto Bevilacqua (2159)
- Black
- Riccardo Larghi (1897)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- C.to Provinciale CO
- Year
- 1999
- Opening
- Benoni Defense: Four Pawns Attack, Main Line (A69)
About this chess game
This chess game between Roberto Bevilacqua (2159) and Riccardo Larghi (1897) was played at C.to Provinciale CO in 1999 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Benoni Defense: Four Pawns Attack, Main Line (A69). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Roberto Bevilacqua games or Riccardo Larghi games? This Roberto Bevilacqua vs Riccardo Larghi encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Benoni Defense: Four Pawns Attack, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Roberto Bevilacqua vs Riccardo Larghi?
Roberto Bevilacqua vs Riccardo Larghi (1999) finished 1–0, a win for Roberto Bevilacqua.
What opening was played in Roberto Bevilacqua vs Riccardo Larghi?
The game opened with the Benoni Defense: Four Pawns Attack, Main Line (ECO A69).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Roberto Bevilacqua vs Riccardo Larghi, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.