Peter M Bevan vs Andrew Jeanes
14. South Wales Int 2017, 2017 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation (A34).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Peter M Bevan vs Andrew Jeanes with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Peter M Bevan (1933)
- Black
- Andrew Jeanes (1691)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 14. South Wales Int 2017
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation (A34)
About this chess game
This chess game between Peter M Bevan (1933) and Andrew Jeanes (1691) was played at 14. South Wales Int 2017 in 2017 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation (A34). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Peter M Bevan games or Andrew Jeanes games? This Peter M Bevan vs Andrew Jeanes encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Peter M Bevan vs Andrew Jeanes?
Peter M Bevan vs Andrew Jeanes (2017) finished 1–0, a win for Peter M Bevan.
What opening was played in Peter M Bevan vs Andrew Jeanes?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation (ECO A34).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Peter M Bevan vs Andrew Jeanes, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.