Stefan Beukema vs Roy Yinian Zhang
WY BU16 2012, 2012 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Levenfish Variation (B71).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Stefan Beukema vs Roy Yinian Zhang with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Stefan Beukema (2262)
- Black
- Roy Yinian Zhang (1898)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- WY BU16 2012
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Levenfish Variation (B71)
About this chess game
This chess game between Stefan Beukema (2262) and Roy Yinian Zhang (1898) was played at WY BU16 2012 in 2012 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Levenfish Variation (B71). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Stefan Beukema games or Roy Yinian Zhang games? This Stefan Beukema vs Roy Yinian Zhang encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Levenfish Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Stefan Beukema vs Roy Yinian Zhang?
Stefan Beukema vs Roy Yinian Zhang (2012) finished 1–0, a win for Stefan Beukema.
What opening was played in Stefan Beukema vs Roy Yinian Zhang?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Levenfish Variation (ECO B71).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Stefan Beukema vs Roy Yinian Zhang, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.