Marco Bettalli vs Stefano Bellincampi
Siena Roberto Magari-mem op-A, date unknown · Result 0–1 · Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit (A07).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Marco Bettalli vs Stefano Bellincampi with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Marco Bettalli (2089)
- Black
- Stefano Bellincampi (2049)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Siena Roberto Magari-mem op-A
- Opening
- Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit (A07)
About this chess game
This chess game between Marco Bettalli (2089) and Stefano Bellincampi (2049) was played at Siena Roberto Magari-mem op-A and finished 0–1. The opening was the Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit (A07). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Marco Bettalli games or Stefano Bellincampi games? This Marco Bettalli vs Stefano Bellincampi encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Marco Bettalli vs Stefano Bellincampi?
Marco Bettalli vs Stefano Bellincampi finished 0–1, a win for Stefano Bellincampi.
What opening was played in Marco Bettalli vs Stefano Bellincampi?
The game opened with the Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit (ECO A07).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Marco Bettalli vs Stefano Bellincampi, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.