Joeffrey Betita vs Remy De Ruysscher
CP.2008.P.00007, 2008 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Joeffrey Betita vs Remy De Ruysscher with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Joeffrey Betita (1410)
- Black
- Remy De Ruysscher (1869)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- CP.2008.P.00007
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31)
About this chess game
This chess game between Joeffrey Betita (1410) and Remy De Ruysscher (1869) was played at CP.2008.P.00007 in 2008 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Joeffrey Betita games or Remy De Ruysscher games? This Joeffrey Betita vs Remy De Ruysscher encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Joeffrey Betita vs Remy De Ruysscher?
Joeffrey Betita vs Remy De Ruysscher (2008) finished 1–0, a win for Joeffrey Betita.
What opening was played in Joeffrey Betita vs Remy De Ruysscher?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (ECO D31).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Joeffrey Betita vs Remy De Ruysscher, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.