Tibor Besztercsenyi vs Laszlo Havaskori
2017 · Result ½–½ · Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation (B11).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Tibor Besztercsenyi vs Laszlo Havaskori with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Tibor Besztercsenyi (1798)
- Black
- Laszlo Havaskori (1902)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation (B11)
About this chess game
This chess game between Tibor Besztercsenyi (1798) and Laszlo Havaskori (1902) was played in 2017 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation (B11). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Tibor Besztercsenyi games or Laszlo Havaskori games? This Tibor Besztercsenyi vs Laszlo Havaskori encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Tibor Besztercsenyi vs Laszlo Havaskori?
Tibor Besztercsenyi vs Laszlo Havaskori (2017) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Tibor Besztercsenyi vs Laszlo Havaskori?
The game opened with the Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation (ECO B11).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Tibor Besztercsenyi vs Laszlo Havaskori, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.