Rene Bergeron vs Cedric Malveau
Pere Noel, 2011 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation (A17).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Rene Bergeron vs Cedric Malveau with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Rene Bergeron (1665)
- Black
- Cedric Malveau (1972)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Pere Noel
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation (A17)
About this chess game
This chess game between Rene Bergeron (1665) and Cedric Malveau (1972) was played at Pere Noel in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation (A17). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Rene Bergeron games or Cedric Malveau games? This Rene Bergeron vs Cedric Malveau encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Rene Bergeron vs Cedric Malveau?
Rene Bergeron vs Cedric Malveau (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Rene Bergeron.
What opening was played in Rene Bergeron vs Cedric Malveau?
The game opened with the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation (ECO A17).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Rene Bergeron vs Cedric Malveau, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.