Alexander Berelowitsch vs Jamal Akbar
2010 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Modern Bc4 Variation (B35).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alexander Berelowitsch vs Jamal Akbar with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alexander Berelowitsch (2571)
- Black
- Jamal Akbar (1881)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Modern Bc4 Variation (B35)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alexander Berelowitsch (2571) and Jamal Akbar (1881) was played in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Modern Bc4 Variation (B35). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alexander Berelowitsch games or Jamal Akbar games? This Alexander Berelowitsch vs Jamal Akbar encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Modern Bc4 Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alexander Berelowitsch vs Jamal Akbar?
Alexander Berelowitsch vs Jamal Akbar (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Alexander Berelowitsch.
What opening was played in Alexander Berelowitsch vs Jamal Akbar?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Modern Bc4 Variation (ECO B35).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alexander Berelowitsch vs Jamal Akbar, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.