Marlies Bensdorp-De Labaca vs Meike Wortel
Nijmegen, 2002 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation (E70).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Marlies Bensdorp-De Labaca vs Meike Wortel with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Marlies Bensdorp-De Labaca (2125)
- Black
- Meike Wortel (2078)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Nijmegen
- Year
- 2002
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation (E70)
About this chess game
This chess game between Marlies Bensdorp-De Labaca (2125) and Meike Wortel (2078) was played at Nijmegen in 2002 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation (E70). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Marlies Bensdorp-De Labaca games or Meike Wortel games? This Marlies Bensdorp-De Labaca vs Meike Wortel encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Marlies Bensdorp-De Labaca vs Meike Wortel?
Marlies Bensdorp-De Labaca vs Meike Wortel (2002) finished 1–0, a win for Marlies Bensdorp-De Labaca.
What opening was played in Marlies Bensdorp-De Labaca vs Meike Wortel?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation (ECO E70).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Marlies Bensdorp-De Labaca vs Meike Wortel, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.