Alejandro Benitez Galeano vs Flavio Gonzales Curse
2016 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (B22).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alejandro Benitez Galeano vs Flavio Gonzales Curse with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alejandro Benitez Galeano (1904)
- Black
- Flavio Gonzales Curse (2001)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (B22)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alejandro Benitez Galeano (1904) and Flavio Gonzales Curse (2001) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (B22). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alejandro Benitez Galeano games or Flavio Gonzales Curse games? This Alejandro Benitez Galeano vs Flavio Gonzales Curse encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alejandro Benitez Galeano vs Flavio Gonzales Curse?
Alejandro Benitez Galeano vs Flavio Gonzales Curse (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Alejandro Benitez Galeano vs Flavio Gonzales Curse?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (ECO B22).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alejandro Benitez Galeano vs Flavio Gonzales Curse, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.